Mit app inventor vs Kodular

[Rajat]

Hey just asking what do you all think is best
which one is stable, which one has more useful features which is best for practical and utility use not for commercial
edit: try to give pros and cons for you're ans

[Patryk_F]

I recommend AppInventor. It has fewer components and there are not so many interesting UI solutions in the app, but many components that are in Kodular can be replaced with extensions. AppInventor is more stable, critical bugs are fixed quickly, which cannot be said for Kodular. Their servers are very overloaded at times and have problems compiling to APK. Companion in Chrome, in Kodular is still not working even though this error has been around for a long time. The developers at MIT dealt with this problem the next day.

[Rajat]

thanks for the opinion

[Anke]

Is MIT app inventor best choice for me or not?

Yes, there are advantages and disadvantages to both (AI2 & Kodular). From my point of view, one of the most important advantages of Kodular is that you can set the → packageName there. Most things (components) that are missing in AI2 are possible with extensions, as @Patryk_F said. But unfortunately not → ExoPlayer. On the other hand, AI2 is more reliable / stable, has fewer bugs, bugs are fixed much faster, already uses the AndroidX libraries, switching screens is faster and APKs are smaller …

[Rajat]

thanks for the reply