with true, for images 1024x1024 I get images with logo...
carne (1024×1024) (pollinations.ai)
using the web component and "nologo=yes/no" it seems to work even for images 1024x1024..
with true, for images 1024x1024 I get images with logo...
carne (1024×1024) (pollinations.ai)
using the web component and "nologo=yes/no" it seems to work even for images 1024x1024..
And here are the higher sizes. The image is still obtained but with the same size as before. Therefore, the extension should not return an error. It should return the image as returned by the api. The lack of an image is misleading.
I think they have a broken API. Just specify a larger size and it returns 1024x1024 without a logo.
https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/carne?width=1500&height=1500&seed=53&nologo=true
Yes, with the yes/no parameter it works... strange, because from their examples it should be false/true...
It is Giving Logo In 1024x1024 But Use High Pixels to Get no logo To true
I edited the subject accordingly
Taifun
I have Figured how to get no logo Image See Here
Image1
and
Image 2
use seed 42 with no logo True to Get Image without Watermark.
Hey @Ramon and @Patryk_F Please Test
I also put the ability to share the image and every time, with a different image, it sends the same one. Which is a lion on some rocks
Can the image it displays be saved?
You can display an image in canvas and then save it, canvas offers this possibility. Perhaps you can also save the file using the web component and the get method.
I don't know how to do it, I made some attempts that I thought I could do it. But...
there is a default component called Imagebot in MIT app inventor. What is the additional feature in this extension other then the default one.
The ImageBot component uses another API.
Hey! I'm one of the devs behind pollinations.ai. Let us know if you need any help/specific functionality.
The image size is currently capped like this:
const maxPixels = 1024 * 1024;
// if we exaggerate with the dimensions, cool things down a little
// maintaining aspect ratio
if (width * height > maxPixels) {
const ratio = Math.sqrt(maxPixels / (width * height));
width = Math.floor(width * ratio);
height = Math.floor(height * ratio);
}
So for example you can do 1024x1024, 768x768. If you go above it will scale down according to the maximum pixels. So you can do 2048x512. if you do 4096x1024 it will go down to 2048x512.
We could relax those limits a little but at some point to not run out of memory we need a maximum size.
The nologo=true parameter was getting a small syntax change. Sorry, we don't have any real place with updated documentation.
In case you use Discord we have a community where we are trying to actively respond too: pollinations
So now there is a nologo = yes instead of nologo = true?
To give the whole context: We wanted to make the nologo parameter require a sort of password that changes once in a while. So we get people to check in with our community. But I see now that this is annoying for use cases like yours.
Until I think about a better permanent solution I've allowed nologo=true again: https://pollinations.ai/p/patent%20diagram%20dolphin%20to%20human%20communication%20device?seed=12354&nologo=true
It looks like the ImageBot component requires the user to pay and subscribe to OpenAI's API and provide an OpenAI API key.
We created the Pollinations image URL to make image generation more easily accessible.
I was just thinking in the context of the app inventor it may be best to enable some quite strict NSFW filtering in our image API. We currently have that functionality behind a flag. The model at least in theory allows you to generate nudity if the user provides that kind of prompt.
You can Block It. First verify The Content By Gpt-3 and Then Give image if it is not and If it is Then Give red flag. Vote Should I Add It Or no